logo
  • Home
  • About
    • Goals
    • Core Values
    • What’s “Representative” Government?
    • Precept of Truth
    • Contact
  • Answers
    • Q&A About the Sonoma Verde PID; Do Homeowners Pay More in Taxes Than the Rest of Us?
    • City Hall NOT Unanimous!
    • Purchasing 13 Acres for City Hall?
  • Transparency
    • City Plan
    • City Financial Records
      • Fire Department 2016 Budget
    • City Council Meeting Minutes
    • Contracts & Agreements
      • Triple Creek Development Agreement
      • City Hall Construction
      • Office Furniture Invoices
  • Press Page
  • Quotes
  • Events

Financial 180 for Our City!

Posted on May 1, 2018 by Robert Steinhagen

In two short years, we’ve restored the health of our City’s financial condition while giving taxpayers a break, which is the result of our commitment to finally bringing in fiscal responsibility, sound financial planning, and taxpayer relief.

We actually ended our last fiscal year with a surplus that we put toward paying off the city hall bond debt, where by doing so we saved taxpayers $226,800 in interest!

We put an end to the years of talk about a senior tax cap and finally got it passed. Now our city’s senior citizens will not be impacted by any future municipal tax rate increases.

Putting the sales-tax increase before voters.

We’ve ushered in a new mindset in government, which includes the principle that the government should never increase the tax-rate without the expressed consent of the people.

So, when a $.5 increase to the municipal sales-tax rate was being considered, which would raise the total sales tax rate in the city to 8.25%, we included it in our first-ever citizen survey, where respondents gave overwhelming support.

Though the survey gave overwhelming support for the sales tax-rate increase we still put the issue on the ballot for voters to decide where it was approved by a large margin.*

Comprehensive reviews of all major city contractors.

We brought every major city contractor before the City in open sessions where every Council member had unlimited time to ask questions and get the answers they need as we considered three things:

  1. Is the service provided by the contractor necessary for the city;
  2. Is our contractor best suited to serve our citizens, and;
  3. Are there things in the contract that we should renegotiate to improve the level of service and accountability?

The benefits from this process are undeniable. In some instances, we were able to renegotiate a new contract and in others, we found other contractors that were better suited to meet the City’s needs.

This has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of dollars in savings to taxpayers!  For a city with a $1.1 million budget, that’s significant.

As of March, we were 77% of our revenue for the year and 37% of expenses (13% under where we were projected to be).  As of the end of February, our cash on hand is $1,259,377.  When we took office two years ago, cash on hand was a quarter of that amount, which demonstrates that the financial position of our city is incredibly strong.

The Tax Rollback two years ago did not stop us from lowering the tax rate again!

We also lowered our tax rate to a flat $.15, which proves once and for all that our successful fight to roll back the tax-rate increase imposed on us two years ago did not diminish our City’s financial condition as the political ruling class had claimed it would.

That’s because the financial challenges that our city was facing were not due to a lack in taxpayer funding but the lack of fundamental financial stewardship which was the direct result of fiscal incompetence by officeholders like Moody & Hatfield.

See also “City fees no longer favor developers, but citizens.”

*Before pushing through his added tax rate increase over and above the increase for the city hall bond, former Mayor Moody could have done the very same thing, but he didn’t.  At the end, of course, voters took back control and rolled that tax-rate increase back!

Posted in Municipal Taxes, Taxpayer Rights, Transparency |
« Puppets of M-C’s Former Political Ruling Class!
Promises Made; Promises Kept! »

From Bondage Back to Bondage

A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the Public Treasury.

From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the Public Treasury with a result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy always followed by a dictatorship.

The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through the following sequence:

  • -From Bondage to Spiritual Faith
  • -From Spiritual Faith to Great Courage
  • -From Courage to Liberty
  • -From Liberty to Abundance
  • -From Abundance to Selfishness
  • -From Selfishness to Complacency
  • -From Complacency to Apathy
  • -From Apathy to Dependency
  • -From Dependency back into Bondage

Alexander Fraser Tytler, Lord Woodhouselee

Recent Posts

  • Council Conservatives Walk When Mayor Attempts Sabotage
  • New Mayor Puts City Back into Darkness
  • Free Speech Has Come to An End in M-C!
  • Follow The Money: MCVFD Uses Taxpayer-Funded Grants to Line Personal Pockets
  • Mailing Proves Candidates Are Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing
  • Promises Made; Promises Kept!
  • Financial 180 for Our City!
  • Puppets of M-C’s Former Political Ruling Class!
  • CAD Shows City Hall A True Boondoggle!
  • Goals
  • Core Values
  • Precept of Truth
  • Why I Ran for Office
  • What is “Representative” Government?

“Most people will choose civility over liberty.”

-Winston Churchill
© Robert Steinhagen